Brought to you by NZCity

 | main | news | security | policing 2 Jun 2020 | 
 Main NZ law and order news
Send a link to this article to a friend via email
 Sexual Crime
 White Collar
 Child Abuse
 Political & Misc.

 Crime news
 Home security
 Business security
 Security services
 Policing NZ
 NZ Parole Board
 Kidz Korner
 Firearms in NZ

 For Victims
 Drug Abuse
 Alcohol Abuse
 Legal Resources
 Crime Statistics
 Family Violence
 Support Services
 About Us
 Contact Us

Click here to add to your NZCity Personal Start Page

Gail McFayden - Defence said Murphy had answers
The defence contended that Murphy had an answer to all these matters. His possession of Gail’s personal belongings was consistent with his claim he had stolen her unattended bag. If he had killed her, what did he do with her bikini, hat, jandals and beach squab, none of which were found? He claimed he had burnt things in the incinerator out of panic because he believed the theft would incriminate him in her disappearance. The masking tape found on the body and in the incinerator was typical of what many people would have at home. Murphy read dirty books and crime stories but so did thousands of other people. His semen was compatible with that found on the body but also with 90 percent of the male population. He often told lies, and often shaved off his facial hair. The scratches on his legs were consistent with his work. He cut the bottom out of his bag because it was rotten. While fibres from Murphy’s bag matched those on the tape and under Gail’s nails, there was nothing to show they came from a common source.

Next related article: Forward to Gail McFayden - High Court trialGail McFayden - High Court trial
Prev related article: Back to Gail McFayden - Circumstantial evidenceGail McFayden - Circumstantial evidence

Back to Gail McFadyen Index

© 2020 NZCity
For marketing opportunities contact: